Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(8): 4181-4188, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1844361

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in a large number of patients requiring intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The current knowledge on the tracheotomies regarding the time form intubation, method and ventilatory parameters optimal for their performance in the mechanically ventilated patients with COVID ARDS are scarce; thus, the aim of this study is to present new data regarding their safety, adverse events and timing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study is based on the data of 66 critically ill COVID patients including demographic data, timing and technique of tracheotomy, ventilatory parameters in the time of procedure, as well as complication and survival rate. RESULTS: A number of 66 patients with COVID-related pneumonia were included in the study, among whom 32 were tracheotomized-25 patients underwent an early tracheotomy and 7 patients had late tracheotomy. The median duration of mechanical ventilation before the tracheotomy in the early group was 8 days (IQR 6-10) compared to 11 days (IQR 11-12.5.) p < 0.001) in late group. Risk of death in tracheotomy patients was significantly growing with growing level of PEEP and FiO2 at the moment of decision on tracheotomy, OR = 1.91 CI95 (1.23;3.57); p = 0.014 and OR = 1.18 CI95(1.03;1.43); p = 0.048, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early percutaneous tracheotomy is safe (both in terms of risk of viral transmission and complication rate) and feasible in COVID-19 patients. Stability of gas exchange, and ventilatory parameters are the main prognostic factors of the outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
2.
4.
HNO ; 69(8): 650-657, 2021 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1182228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID(coronavirus disease)-19 pandemic is characterized by high infectivity, droplet transmission, and high viral load in the upper respiratory tract. Severe disease courses are associated with interstitial pneumonia and ventilated patients, in whom tracheotomy (TT)-a droplet- and aerosol-producing medical intervention-is regularly necessary. TT as a potential infection risk for medical staff is scarcely found in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify droplet exposure of the surgical team during TT, to better define the requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical TT was performed in four non-infectious patients, during which the surgeon and his assistant both wore a surgical nasal mask with a transparent visor. After the procedure, the type, distribution, and number of droplets on the visor were determined macroscopically and microscopically. RESULTS: An average of 29 droplets were found on the middle third of the visor, 4 on the right third, and 13 on the left third, with an average droplet size of 571 µm (±â€¯381 µm). The smallest droplets were 55 µm, the largest 1431 µm. An increase in the number of droplets was found with increased ventilation during the procedure. Blood droplets were more common than secretion droplets. CONCLUSION: Contamination of the visor with droplets was demonstrated. Especially in the case of TT in highly infectious patients, e.g., COVID-19 patients, the use of hooded headgear in combination with breathing apparatus with air purification and power supply is recommended to ensure best protection from infection for the surgeon and the surgical assistant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4501-4507, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1092672

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes in 10% of patients a severe respiratory distress syndrome managed with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), sometimes difficult to wean. The role of tracheotomy is debated for the possible risks for patients and staff. We are going to describe here our experience with surgical tracheotomy in COVID-19 positive patients. METHODS: We enrolled all intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring longer than 10 days of IMV. Demographic, clinical, respiratory, complications, and outcomes data were collected, in a particular length of weaning from sedation and IMV, in-ICU and in-hospital mortality rate. All healthcare operators involved were tested for SARS-CoV2 by pharyngeal swab and blood test (antibody test). RESULTS: 13 out of 68 ICU patients (19.1%) underwent surgical tracheotomy after a median intubation period of 14 days. The mean age was 60 (56-65) years. 85% were male patients. Postoperative mild bleeding was seen in 30.7%, pneumothorax in 7.7%. Mean weaning from sedation required 3 days, 19 days from IMV. In-ICU and in-hospital COVID-infection-related mortality was 23.1% and 30.7%, respectively. None of the healthcare operators was found SARS-CoV2 positive during the period of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 pandemic surgical tracheotomy enables to wean from sedation and subsequently from IMV in a safe way for both patients and personnel.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
6.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 49(2): 140-145, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1001584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Open surgical tracheotomy performed beside (STB) is a standardized procedure in critical ill patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate perioperative complications and the safety of STB in a tertiary care university hospital setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intra- and postoperative complications were retrospectively recorded and associations based on the evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters were studied using regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were included. Early tracheotomy shortened ventilation time after tracheotomy (ventilation before STB ≤ 5 days: mean 9.2 ± 9.1 days; ventilation before STB ≥ 6 days: mean 11.5 ± 10.5 days, p = 0.0001). Overall complications were found in 30/562 cases (5.3%), major complications in 12/562 cases (2.1%). Significant risk factors for overall tracheotomy related complications were higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p = 0.02), lower CRP (OR 0.99, CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.03), higher INR (OR 5.67, CI 1.27-25.34, p = 0.02), longer duration of operation (OR 1.03, CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.04) and tracheotomy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support (OR 6.26, CI 1.21-32.44, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: STB represents a safe surgical procedure, also suitable for patients with an increased risk profile. Careful evaluation of individual risk factors should be favored to reduce procedure related complications.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Tracheotomy , Hospitals , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
10.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1403-1408, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-141689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The global COVID-19 pandemic brings new challenges to otolaryngology resident education. Surgical volume and clinic visits are curtailed, personal protective equipment for operating room participation is restricted, and the risk of COVID-19 disease transmission during heretofore routine patient care is the new norm. METHODS: We describe a small-team "cohorting" protocol including guidelines for faculty and resident in common clinical scenarios with attention paid to the risk of common otolaryngologic procedures. RESULTS: A rotating small-team approach was implemented at each clinical site, limiting interaction between department members but providing comprehensive coverage. Faculty were involved at the earliest phase of clinical interactions. Guidelines delineated faculty and resident roles based on risk stratification by patient COVID status and anticipated procedures. Special consideration was given to high-risk procedures such as endoscopy and tracheotomy. CONCLUSIONS: A small-team-based approach with guidelines for faculty/resident roles may mitigate risk while optimizing patient care and maximizing education.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Otolaryngology/education , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tracheostomy/methods , Tracheotomy/methods , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Faculty, Medical/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Male , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Safety Management/methods , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , United States
11.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 30(5): 477-480, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-88434

ABSTRACT

Background: The current global COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the novel coronavirus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Given that SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible, surgical societies have recommended that procedures with a high risk of aerosolization be avoided or delayed. However, some high-risk procedures, such as those related to head and neck malignancies, cannot always be delayed. Care must be taken during aerosol-generating procedures to minimize viral transmission as much as possible. Preoperative testing for COVID-19, limited operating room personnel, adequate personal protective equipment, and surgical technique are factors to consider for high-risk procedures. Methods: This article presents the case of an awake tracheotomy performed for a transglottic mass causing airway obstruction. Results: With detailed planning and specific techniques, the amount of aerosolization was reduced, and the procedure was performed as safely as possible. Conclusion: This case provides a template for future aerosol-generating procedures during respiratory pandemics.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/surgery , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/surgery , Tracheotomy/methods , Aerosols/adverse effects , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Glottis , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Laryngeal Neoplasms/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , Wakefulness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL